Discussion about this post

User's avatar
John Carter's avatar

In another life, I was a lecturer in computer science. For my student's programming assignments, they were passed through a tool called MOSS (measure of software similarity) that would detect and flag if another student had attempted to pass work off as their own (detailed paper of the tool: http://theory.stanford.edu/~aiken/publications/papers/sigmod03.pdf). I empathize when I think of my former colleagues having to make judgement calls about AI generated submissions.

A recent trend I've noticed. I'm not an avid user of Facebook, having an account mostly for my business presence and the local woodworking associations buy/sell groups. I've noticed a number of number of groups have what I presume to be AI bots posting all sorts of AI generated nonsense to them with titles like: "dresser in cherry" where it is almost certainly mahogany or sapele, and other insane things shower enclosures supposedly craved from gigantic trees in a bathroom :(https://www.pinterest.com/pin/these-epic-showers-are-made-from-giant-slabs-of-live-edge-wood--439804719876352689/)

I've read a few discussions on reddit and other furniture maker sites, where customers have approached makers with these as inspiration! Probably both good (quickly prompt for ideas to show the customer about styles and sizes) and bad ( creating impractical unworldly items that can't be produced for less than the cost and associated complexity of a fighter jet).

Expand full comment
Matthew's avatar

It’s interesting that you bring up plagiarism, since that’s what generative AI is when you boil it down. I’m glad you talk about using it sparingly like you would a reference book, but I certainly see a lot of misuse of it out in the world and it could be a slippery slope that results in lost jobs (especially for creatives) if left unchecked.

Expand full comment
4 more comments...

No posts